Sunday, April 26, 2009

Achilles and the Tortoise

Achilles and the Tortoise is a Japanese film from Director Takeshi Kitano that follows the life of struggling artist, Machisu, orphaned after his father’s sudden suicide. His parents had indulged him as a creative genius, but once in the real world Machisu finds himself unable to compete artistically in a harsh and unsusceptible society. Stubbornly, he strives to create a masterpiece at the expense of everyone he holds dear.

The story is rooted in creativity and failure, but the narrative losses that Machisu suffers (first his father’s suicide, then his mother’s, then his best friend’s, then his other friend’s, then his daughter’s…) became so repetitive that it lost its capacity for emotional impact and seemed to turn the experience into satirical attack against those who chose such artistic pursuits.

The way that Machisu turns so coldly inhuman would, normally, be attributed to the severe emotional turmoil that life has delivered him, but Kitano blames it instead on the character’s artistic insanity that has left him ravaged and devoid of friends, love, fame, or fulfillment. All of the artworks featured in the film are drastically different from the mise-en-scene that surrounds them, emphasizing their ridiculous nature and obvious misplacement.

The title refers to Zeno’s paradox, implying that Machisu—the stubborn Achilles—will never be able to infiltrate the art world. Until the end, that is, when after Machisu finally throws down his paintbrush and abandons his lifelong pursuit, subtitles state that Achilles finally caught the Tortoise after all. The ending felt cheap and wrong, positioning an ideology that insists that modern art is irrational, visually disturbing, worthless, and disdainful—a statement that feels invalid and disheartening.

One and a half.

Adventureland

 

James Brennan, a young college graduate, ready for a grand summer of fun and freedom finds out that his parents can no longer pay for his trip to Europe and he’s forced to get a summer job. Having no prior work experience, he has little choice but to take a job at the local amusement park under low wages and menial, boring tasks.

Brennan quickly overlooks his disdain when he meets Em (Twilight’s Kristen Stewart), an intriguing, hypnotizing, and promiscuous coworker. Brennan moves into a semi-serious relationship with her, marketing himself as a sensitive, caring guy not interested in just “getting laid,” which would be more believable if the culmination of the film didn’t lead to him finally achieving non-virgin status.

But the emotional upheaval and inter-relational work drama all felt very real and offered an authentic contrast for the hormone-driven adolescents working at the amusement park from the clean-cut fun it usually represents to the kids who go there. The entire premise of the film was comedic and engaging, and Director Greg Mottola completely captured the caught-in-midst-of-summer setting, placing the audience in a quirky, carefree diegesis that created perfect chaos when the emotional stakes of the characters took a devastating turn.

The bulk of the film kept close to the run-down amusement park, but the camera always gave the audience something new and visually stimulating in this idiosyncratic world of former-glory. It was clear that Mottola’s semi-autobiographic story gave him great insight from previous experience, but sometimes the narrative felt focused more in re-lived nostalgia as opposed to engulfing the viewer in present-day (however present one could be in a film set in 1987) trials, hysteria, forgiveness, and love.

Three.